Each of the discussed learning strategies have their benefits
and are useful in certain situations. I do not think there is a case of “one
strategy fits all”. Teachers may wish to try different strategies for different
groups of students and continue with the successful approach.
In my opinion, if we keep the focus on the student, then PBL is
the best strategy for engineering courses. It incorporates all the aspects of
the students’ learning and manifests it in form of a multi faceted project. In my
experience, the students tend to enjoy PBL the most as they find it more challenging and hence more satisfying too, once they accomplish the learning outcomes.
Interactive learning can play a big part in keeping the students
engaged and can lead to a deeper insight into to the subject matter. It also ensures
the students to learn by doing embedding understanding of the concepts.
Direct instruction although gives the teacher control over the
students and the content to be covered, I do not think it should be used
generously in institutes of higher education, such as ours. It makes the students
too dependent on the teacher. Hence they fail to explore other different means of
learning. I admit there are certain courses that do need to employ this method
but its use should be minimal.
Hi Atif, I completely agree in an engineering course we would expect that PBL would be the assessment type of choice. Interactive Lecturing is also a great motivator which I suspect in disciplines like engineering which often involves direct instruction is a welcome alternative at times.
ReplyDelete