Amongst the three articles that I had short-listed, I found the research done by Abbasi and Iqbal to be interesting enough to share. Their research was conducted to find out the ratio of mathematics educators at post/under graduate level in Pakistan, who make the mathematics courses livelier for their students.
They chose three criteria namely dedication, logical reasoning and concrete examples and use of technology to measure the interest a course can generate amongst the students. The reasoning for using dedication as a criterion, given in the research is also very interesting. The researchers have concluded that if the educators proclaim their passion and dedication towards the subject in front of their students, it has a positive effect on the students’ motivations levels and moral.
In conclusion they researchers have shown that the correlation of using technology in class to the students’ perception of the educators’ attempt to make their course interesting is just about 99%. It is closely followed by the logical reasoning and concrete examples at about 98%.
A few questions though remain unanswered from this article. For example the authors have not defined the terms "interesting", "dedication", "logical reasoning" etc. Secondly the authors do not show a correlation between making the course interesting and it enhancing the understanding of the students. We can assume it has proportionality but yet a deeper insight into it would have been beneficial.
I tend to agree with their research in general since I am a strong believer in making “boring” courses to be more “student friendly”. This helps to catch the students’ attention and somehow it can help the learners to see the same content from a different, more interesting vantage point hence creating a genuine curiosity, ultimately leading to a better understanding.